In this video I discuss a recent Navy-Marine Corps court ruling which found that bump stocks do not meet the definition of a machine gun. This cuts against the ATF's regulation of the devices. This case could also aid future bump stock case challenges and future court cases challenging the ATF's interpretation of frames and receivers and pistol braces.
🇺🇸 Support the Channel🇺🇸
Join USCCA: http://usccapartners.com/armedscholar
Join The Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/armedscholar
Special thanks to Patreon Members: Colin Smith, question question, and Roy Kim!
Join FPC: JoinFPC.org
Safelife defense: https://safelifedefense.com/ref/Anthony.Miranda/
Code: "armedscholar" for 10% Off
BlackoutCoffee: https://www.blackoutcoffee.com?p=rJ8E59-fO
Code: "ArmedScholar" for 10% Off
🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/armedscholaryt/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/armedscholaryt
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/armedscholar
📷 My YouTube Setup 📷
Camera: (Sony A7siii) https://amzn.to/36YIe96
Lens: (Tamron 17-28) https://amzn.to/3wSPn5H
Lighting: (GVM RGB) https://amzn.to/3zpDfdT
Microphone: (Rode Wireless) https://amzn.to/3iBgnkU
Camera Stand: (Broadcast Boom) https://amzn.to/2V7meWV
Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!
0 Comments